|
back
|
||
|
The driving force that motivates these drawings is a kind of wild and more or less uncontrollable gestural reflex.
In the chapters 'the Painter who Destroys his own Work' and 'the Gambler who is Taking a Bath' of his book on the negative affects, psychologist Silvan Tomkins describes really well that what I believe is the psychology behind this gesture:(1) the Painter who Destroys his own Work "A painter has elaborated long on a canvas. It has been difficult but he has made progress to a certain point. Then everything he does seems to be wrong. The painting goes from bad to worse, and the painter, feeling more and more incompetent and disgusted with himself, struggles against the feeling of hopelessness until at a critical moment he dips his brush into his palette indiscriminately and disfigures his painting in an explosion of anger and humiliation. The feeling of humiliation is profound and complete. Ultimately he recovers and begins again." the Gambler who is Taking a Bath "Despite iron self-discipline among professional gamblers, there are few who have not experienced what is known as "taking a bath". (..) The phenomenon (..) depends upon the failure of a reparative strategy (of investing very heavily on an apparently save venture in an attempt at a quick reversal of previous loss). "If the gambler (..)should now a second time suffer and unexpected and in his view unmerited loss, he may now be overwhelmed with shame, with self-contempt, with anger and with distress, compounded not only by the new loss but by the breakdown of his self-control and his deteriorating judgment. It is at just such a moment that he is a candidate for "taking a bath," which will "clean" him and purify his soul by bathing him in total defeat. He is driven now to magnify his humiliation so that he may wallow in it that eventually he may be purified. At this point he will take all of his money, which it may have taken him years of hard work to accumulate, and invest it in what appears, even to him, to be at best only a remote possibility, in order to "get it over with." If he wins now, which he regards as improbable although desirable, he will not only recoup his losses but make a very large profit. He will have turned defeat into the greatest of his victories. If he loses, which he expects, and in part hopes he will, his humiliation will be magnified, his defeat total. He resorts to such an extreme, self- defeating tactic because he feels he cannot reduce his feelings of humiliation and loss otherwise than by magnifying them so that he is utterly consumed and finally purified, "cleaned," "bathed." It is as though he said to himself, "If I have been stupid, I may as well go the whole way." After this complete loss many gamblers report a feeling of peace, that the struggle is over, that they have hit bottom and can suffer no longer. Some gamblers, however, do not attain the nirvana state until several hours later, after having immersed themselves completely in their despair." |
Tomkins' use of 'nirvana' hints at the
presence of a spiritual pathway.
In the drawings on this site, instead of
starting over with his original painting,
Painter took the explosive gesture that was
laden with anger, humiliation and shame and
repeats it over and over.
This gradually transforms the explosive
gesture into a creative process of
variations on a theme.
taking a bath The repetition distributes the affective charge over multiple actions. It weakens the negative affects without obscuring them, and gives a level of control without totalizing it. This site also tries to develop some methods to summon the charge without the risk of material loss, like an actor playing out a dramatic scene without suffering the real consequences. Their reward is like a mild version of the enlightened state of the gambler in the bathtub lalalalalala (1)Silvan Tomkins Affect Imagery Consciousness Volume II: The Negative Affects |
7.the WordPad
12.The ABC of
14.Jack Jack & de
zines, sounds,
marc van elburg 016 |