|
back
|
||
under construction
painter is trapped in a mad loop:
that loop is a kind of machine or system-
driven by a selreferential oscillation-
I like to think that
the common source of grawlixes and early non-objective drawing is what deleuze and guattari have called fluxes:
freedrawing = grawlixes = fluxes
that in the context of S.Tomkins' theory of affect; fluxes and grawlixes are affects without an object
that in that context, the schizo represents a parasitic agent or position (part not part) in relation to machines or systems:
agency = parasite = schizo
and that it holds the promise of a line of escape
|
that (one) cannot, within the context of occidental arts, call upon 'free' and 'mad' without also conjuring up
traces of the oppressive, colonial and racial histories intertwined with these
terms
the unmarked schema and the orientalist desert
the primitive schema and white supremacy thinking
the animatedness schema and racial stereotypes
the 'off the track' schema and neuro-normativity
the gendered rational-irrational schema and patriarchy
that in freedrawing,
the question of breaking of flow
is similar to the question of structure
draw:
(repeat forever)
do not follow the logic of the square:
|
7.the WordPad
12.The ABC of
14.Jack Jack & de
zines, sounds,
marc van elburg 016 |